Poker Community Unhappy with Paywall for WSOP Main Event

Some poker community is unhappy with putting the WSOP Main Event final table behind a paywall. Many poker players expressed their disappointment on social media after reports of making the final table a pay-per-view event.

One of the most vocal poker players against the plan is Alexandra Botez. According to bookie pay per head sources, she said that poker should keep the final table free to view.

Those against the pay-per-view plan argued that putting the final table behind a paywall will hurt poker’s growth. Also, the WSOP will miss out on attracting people to the card game during a prestigious event.

Poker Community Unhappy with Proposed Pay-Per-View

According to online poker reviews and news sites, Botez had some harsh words for PokerGO, which broadcasts the World Series of Poker. The question is whether they have any obligation to promote the sport. Some spectators are prepared to pay to see the final table, while others insist everyone should have free access. As a result of the uproar, there is now much discussion regarding poker’s potential for future development as a sport. Although the final table of the WSOP Main Event is behind a paywall, it has nonetheless garnered a large audience.

However, not everyone thinks PokerGO should be put in a difficult position after paying for the rights. This criticism should be directed squarely at Caesar. However, several notable figures, such as former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya, contributed to the debate.

Some others argued that it was customary to air commercials during the Main Event if they showed it for free as they do on television. Some have argued that the tournament’s increased size makes it nothing more than a lottery, rendering it pointless. According to the latest poker news reports, it is probably safe to assume that most professional poker players do not know who the previous 10 WSOP Main Event winners were.